Aurelio De Laurentiis
De Laurentiis was right … or maybe did not.
The Adl’s stataments after Real Madrid, for many people without motive, for many people inopportune, for many people inopportune in that moment, and finally, for many people both without motive and inopportune and inopportune in that moment. After Atalanta, the same people begin to wonder: Is De Laurentiis right?
Against the team from Bergamo, actually Napoli seemed physically tired, and the opposing team has dominated. Atalanta does not takes part in other competitions, just the championship, and organizes matches in a scientific way, this is true. The Napoli’s footballers instead, they wake up in a hotel room and almost get confused and forget where they are, and what is the competition in which they are about to partecipate. But Partenopei have a wide and valuable roster, which, if fully exploited …
Napoli seemed incapable of changing the dress of its play yesterday. Before the 4-3-3, then the 4-2-3-1 and in the end the 4-2-4. Yet, in spite of the fact that Sarri changed the tactic, Napoli seemed playing the same way, as if it had never been tried other movements, but only those that made Naples a brilliant team.
On the other hand, Milik and Pavoletti are not in shape for the reasons we all know. For this motive, they lived too little in the roster, and perhaps there has not been time to try other movements.
And Rog? He seems to be a skilful player, ready to exploit any chance, in place of Callejon for example, in fact the Spanish footballer seems without energy. On the other hand, he looks like a footballer in love with the ball, these are his caracteristics, and from the point of view of the Napoletan coach, he risks to slow the team play.
Considering what I wrote, Adl is right or not? Perhaps as often it occurs, both Adl and Sarri are rigth, because absolute truth does not exist.
There are those who think that President is right, those who think that he is wrong, and there are those who do not judge like Salomone.